global warming

The Future Looks As Bright as the Sun!

View Kirsten Flynn's profile
Tags:

 

I am going out on a limb here, and guessing that the EcoTuesday community believes that global warming is both real and caused largely by human influences. The preponderance of scientific evidence supports this, and scientists are the most careful people in the world about making sure their statements are backed by fact. 

 

So with that as a given, and again assuming that most of us care about a livable future the question becomes, “so what the heck can I do about it?” The people that I have meet at our EcoTuesday evenings care deeply, and often center their professional life on solutions to this and other environmental problems.  But it is challenging to know what actions can really have an effect.

 

This might be part of the reason for the results of a recent Gallup poll.  It showed that concern about environmental issues has dropped between 4 and 9 percentage points over the course of one year. The only bright note was that the two issues that had dropped the least were issues of safe, clean drinking water and global warming.  I think this drop is party because people suffer from concern burnout.  If they cannot see that they can make a difference, they cease to be concerned as a defense against feeling hopeless. 

 

This month’s speaker at our Silicon Valley EcoTuesday can refresh your level of hope.  We will have James Cook, Director of Business Development at First Solar, join us this month.  He will speak to us about his work in large-scale solar generation plants.  I am especially eager to hear about his personal passion to help the state of California achieve 50% renewable electrical generation by 2030 and push toward FFFF – Fossil Fuel Free by Fifty (2050, that is.)  These goals are striking for a number of reasons. 

 

Most of us know that CO2 is a greenhouse gas that contributes to global warming.  Carbon dioxide is the largest single contributor, in fact CO2 accounts for 83% of all the green house gas (GHG) emissions in the United States.  Don’t glaze over on me here, I’m am coming to why this is so exciting! 

 

By far, the largest source of carbon dioxide emissions is the burning of carbon-based fuels for electrical generation.  This is interesting, since so many think that transportation is greatest problem.  If we could reach the goal of generating our electricity from fossil free sources by 2050, we would be greatly reducing the largest cause of GHG emissions.  If this were accompanied be incremental improvements in all other emissions, we would truly be looking at improving the environmental outlook for future generations. 

 

So, although it can seem that solar power is a fancy perk for a green building, or only of interest to energy policy wonks, in reality it holds the potential to be a huge part of the solution to global warming, within our lifetimes!

Climate Legislation for 2010 Update

View Lisa Ann Pinkerton's profile
Tags:

When it comes to energy reform on Capitol Hill, there’s a lot of maneuvering going on right now.  So far this year, seven different pieces of legislation from both democrats and republicans have either been introduced, passed Senate committee or passed in the House.  Melaine Nutter, an aid for Congresswoman and Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi stated very clearly at a recent Business Council on Climate Change meeting that Pelosi has made climate legislation one of the flagship issues of her leadership.

With Pelosi at the helm, the House of Representatives as passed one of the seven bills, called the American Clean Energy and Security Act (ACES). It would include a cap and trade on carbon emissions, require the EPA to set vehicle greenhouse gas emissions standards, increase incentives for plug in vehicles, bring more efficiency to buildings and promote performance standards for coal fired power plants.   In addition, it would require the country get at least 20 percent of its energy from renewable sources by 2020 and reduce its greenhouse gas emissions by 42% by 2030. 

However, it’s up the the Senate to finish the job of putting a price on carbon emissions and building a new, green and cleaner energy economy.  As it stands today, the American Power Act, introduced by Senators John Kerry and Joe Liberman is likely to be the foundation with which the Senate forms is version of climate and energy legislation. This month the Congressional Budget Office scored their bill and said that it would cut the deficit by $19 billion over the next decade via cap and trade revenue. This bill calls for increased off shore drilling as well as many of the programs in the ACES bill. It is slightly more lenient in terms of a renewable energy procurement, requiring only 15 percent of energy produced in the US come from renewable sources by 2020, as opposed to the 20 percent in the House ACES bill.  However,  the reductions in greenhouse gas emissions mirror that of ACES- a 42 percent reduction by 2030.

Once the Senate gets around to passing its own version of climate legislation, it will have to be rectified with the House's ACES bill. Time will tell whether the comprised legislation has enough teeth in it to put a dent in carbon offsets,  reduce climate change and accelerate our path to a cleaner energy economy. At that point some may argue the bill isn't worth President Obama's signature. Then again others might be happy with the incremental improvements we get.